🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.